Relationship fault core data

Debugging Core Data Objects • meer-bezoekers.info

relationship fault core data

Core Data automatically fires faults when a persistent property (such To deal efficiently with faults and relationships, see Fetching. If you need to create a relationship between entities in different stores Core Data automatically resolves (fires) the fault when you access data. Class Hierarchy however i am running into the problem where Core Data is not firing a fault when I access an attribute on a relationship. ie.

Figure A department represented by a fault Although the fault is an instance of the Department class, it has not yet been realized—none of its persistent instance variables have yet been set. If it were a requirement that the object graph be complete, then to edit a single attribute of a single employee, it would ultimately be necessary to create objects to represent the whole corporate structure. Firing Faults Fault handling is transparent—you do not have to execute a fetch to realize a fault.

  • Debugging Core Data Objects
  • What Is a Core Data Fault

If at some stage a persistent property of a fault object is accessed, Core Data automatically retrieves the data for the object and initializes the object. This process is commonly referred to as firing the fault. If you access a property on the Department object — its name, for example — the fault fires and Core Data executes a fetch for you to retrieve all of the object's attributes. See NSManagedObject for a list of methods that do not cause faults to fire. Core Data automatically fires faults when a persistent property such as firstName of a fault is accessed.

It's not your fault

However, firing faults individually can be inefficient, and there are better strategies for getting data from the persistent store see Decreasing Fault Overhead. When a fault is fired, Core Data does not go back to the store if the data is available in its cache.

With a cache hit, converting a fault into a realized managed object is very fast—it is basically the same as normal instantiation of a managed object.

If the data is not available in the cache, Core Data automatically executes a fetch for the fault object; this results in a round trip to the persistent store to fetch the data, and again the data is cached in memory.

Whether or not an object is a fault simply means whether or not a given managed object has all its persistent attributes populated and is ready to use.

If you need to determine whether an object is a fault, call its isFault method without firing the fault without accessing any relationships or attributes. If isFault returns NOfalse, then the data must be in memory and therefore the object is not a fault. However, if isFault returns YEStrue, it does not imply that the data is not in memory. The data may be in memory, or it may not, depending on many factors influencing caching. You are strongly discouraged from overriding description in this way.

There is no way to load individual attributes of a managed object on an as-needed basis and avoid realizing retrieving all property values of the entire object. Turning Objects into Faults Turning a realized object into a fault can be useful in pruning the object graph, as well as ensuring that property values are current. Turning a managed object into a fault releases unnecessary memory and sets its in-memory property values to nil.

You can turn a realized object into a fault with the refreshObject: If there are, and you then save the context, you will introduce referential integrity problems to the persistent store. When an object turns into a fault, its didTurnIntoFault method is called. Note Core Data avoids the term unfaulting because it is confusing.

Page faults are triggered, caused, fired, or encountered. Core Data describes this as "turning an object into a fault. If you are observing properties of an object that is turned into a fault and the fault is subsequently realized, you receive change notifications for properties whose values have not in fact changed.

Although the values are not changing semantically from your perspective, the literal bytes in memory are changing as the object is materialized.

Faulting is a concept that often confuses developer new to Core Data. Before I explain what faulting is, I want to show it to you. Clone or download the repository from GitHub and open the project in Xcode 8 or higher. Before we run our experiment, open the data model of the project by selecting Notes. Switch to the graph style of the data model editor to get an idea of the entities, attributes, and relationships defined in the data model.

Notes is an application that manages the user's notes. A note has a title and contents. It also knows when it was created and last updated. A note can be associated with a category and a category can contain multiple notes. In other words, the Note and Category entities share a one-to-many relationship. A note can also have tags and a tag can be linked to multiple notes.

The Note and Tag entities share a many-to-many relationship.

It's not your fault

Build and run the application to give it a try. Make sure Notes contains a few notes, a few categories, and a few tags. That is important for our experiment. Execute the fetch request and print the first note to the console. Run the application to see the result. We fetched a record of the Note entity. But notice that the data associated with the record is missing. Instead we see the word fault. As you know, Core Data can only operate on records of the persistent store once they are loaded into memory.

This is only possible because Core Data is heavily optimized to keep its memory footprint as low as possible.

What Is a Core Data Fault

One of the techniques Core Data uses to accomplish this is faulting. But the team at Apple didn't invent faulting.

Several other frameworks use a similar strategy to accomplish similar goals. Ruby on Rails and Ember come to mind. Even though faulting may look mysterious at first, the idea is simple.

relationship fault core data

Core Data only fetches the data it absolutely needs to satisfy the needs of your application. That is faulting in a nutshell. The idea of faulting is simple, but the underlying implementation is an advanced bit of programming. Fortunately, we don't have to worry about that.

That is the responsibility of the framework.

relationship fault core data

Let me show you how it works with another example. Below the print statement, we safely unwrap the value of the title property and print it to the console and we add another print statement for the note.

We print the note to the console, ask the value of one of the properties of the note, and print the note again. Why we do that becomes clear when we inspect the results in the console. Run the application and take a look at the output in the console.

Despite this fault, we can access the value of the title property and print it to the console. This is confirmed by the third print statement in which we print the note again.

What is happening here? We first asked for the user's notes and Core Data diligently gave us the list of notes.