What is the significance of Judas betraying Jesus with a kiss?
The Book of Mormon can help you build a relationship with God. If Judas sought to make Jesus do more miracles to save Himself from the Cross, then Judas. Hidden for years, the Gospel of Judas now offers a surprising take offers an alternative view of the relationship between Jesus and Judas but said, "has a completely different understanding of God, the world, Christ. First, although Judas was chosen to be one of the twelve (John 6, 64), all scriptural evidence points to the fact that he (Judas) never believed Jesus to be God.
Simon Peter spoke for the twelve: You have the words of eternal life," but Jesus observed then that although Judas was one of the twelve whom he had chosen, he was "a devil. Mark's Gospel states that the chief priests were looking for a way to arrest Jesus. They decided not to do so during the feast [of the Passover ], since they were afraid that people would riot;  instead, they chose the night before the feast to arrest him. According to Luke's account, Satan entered Judas at this time.
The evangelist comments in John Ehrman argues that Judas's betrayal "is about as historically certain as anything else in the tradition",   pointing out that the betrayal is independently attested in the Gospel of Mark, in the Gospel of John, and in the Book of Acts. Meier sums up the historical consensus, stating, "We only know two basic facts about [Judas]: Afterwards, he committed suicide by hanging himself.
Lewisfor example, to reject the view "that every statement in Scripture must be historical truth". Zwiep states that "neither story was meant to be read in light of the other"  and that "the integrity of both stories as complete narratives in themselves is seriously disrespected when the two separate stories are being conflated into a third, harmonized version.
Reed argues that the Matthew account is a midrashic exposition that allows the author to present the event as a fulfillment of prophetic passages from the Old Testament. They argue that the author adds imaginative details such as the thirty pieces of silver, and the fact that Judas hangs himself, to an earlier tradition about Judas's death. Jeremiah 18—9 concerns a potter Illumination from a western manuscript, c.
There are several explanations as to why Judas betrayed Jesus. The Gospel of John account has Judas complaining that money has been spent on expensive perfumes to anoint Jesus which could have been spent on the poor, but adds that he was the keeper of the apostles' purse and used to steal from it.
In this view, Judas is a disillusioned disciple betraying Jesus not so much because he loved money, but because he loved his country and thought Jesus had failed it.
Another is that regardless of the betrayal, Jesus was ultimately destined for crucifixion. Origen of Alexandriain his Commentary on John's Gospel, reflected on Judas's interactions with the other apostles and Jesus' confidence in him prior to his betrayal. They allege various problematic ideological contradictions with the discrepancy between Judas' actions and his eternal punishment. Bruce Reichenbach argues that if Jesus foresees Judas' betrayal, then the betrayal is not an act of free will and therefore should not be punishable.
Conversely, it is argued that just because the betrayal was foretold, it does not prevent Judas from exercising his own free will in this matter. The difficulty inherent in the saying is its paradox: The earliest churches believed "as it is written of him" to be prophetic, fulfilling Scriptures such as that of the suffering servant in Isaiah and the righteous one in Psalm 22, which do not require betrayal at least by Judas as the means to the suffering.
Regardless of any necessity, Judas is held responsible for his act Mark John Calvin states that Judas was predestined to damnation, but writes on the question of Judas' guilt: There is no 'Canon of the Damned', nor any official proclamation of the damnation of Judas. It is speculated that Judas's damnation, which seems possible from the Gospels' text, may not stem from his betrayal of Christ, but from the despair which caused him to subsequently commit suicide.
Schonfield suggested that the crucifixion of Christ was a conscious re-enactment of Biblical prophecy and that Judas acted with the full knowledge and consent of Jesus in "betraying" him to the authorities.
What Happened to Judas? (And Is There a Chance He Ended Up in Heaven?)
The book has been variously described as 'factually groundless',  based on 'little data' and 'wild suppositions',  'disturbing' and 'tawdry'. Irenaeus records the beliefs of one Gnostic sect, the Cainiteswho believed that Judas was an instrument of the SophiaDivine Wisdom, thus earning the hatred of the Demiurge.
His betrayal of Jesus thus was a victory over the materialist world. The Cainites later split into two groups, disagreeing over the ultimate significance of Jesus in their cosmology. However, it adds many of its own tales, probably from local legends, including one of Judas.
In this pseudepigraphic work tells how Judas, as a boy, was possessed by Satanwho caused him to bite himself or anyone else present.
In one of these attacks, Judas bit the young Jesus in the side; and, by touching Him, Satan was exorcised. It further states that the side which Judas supposedly bit was the same side that was pierced by the Holy Lance at the Crucifixion . Gospel of Judas[ edit ] Main article: It appeared to be a 3rd- or 4th-century-AD copy of a 2nd-century original,   relating a series of conversations in which Jesus and Judas interact and discuss the nature of the universe from a Gnostic viewpoint.
The discovery was given dramatic international exposure in April when the US National Geographic magazine published a feature article entitled "The Gospel of Judas" with images of the fragile codex and analytical commentary by relevant experts and interested observers but not a comprehensive translation.
The article's introduction stated: DeConick raises about translation choices are addressed in footnotes in both the popular and critical editions. She concluded that the ongoing clash between scriptural fundamentalism and attempts at revision were childish because of the unreliability of the sources. Therefore, she argued, "People interpret, and cheat. This lack of faith in Jesus is the foundation for all other considerations.
The same holds true for us. If we fail to recognize Jesus as God incarnate, and therefore the only One who can provide forgiveness for our sins and the eternal salvation that comes with it we will be subject to numerous other problems that stem from a wrong view of God. When the synoptic gospels list the twelve, they are always listed in the same general order with slight variations Matthew 10, ; Mark 3, ; Luke 6, The general order is believed to indicate the relative closeness of their personal relationship with Jesus.
Despite the variations, Peter and the brothers James and John are always listed first, which is consistent with their relationships with Jesus Prof. Judas is always listed last, which may indicate his relative lack of a personal relationship with Christ.
Third, Judas was consumed with greed to the point of betraying the trust of not only Jesus, but also his fellow disciples, as we see in John 12, Judas may have desired to follow Jesus simply because he saw the great following and believed he could profit from collections taken for the group.
The fact that Judas was in charge of the moneybag for the group would indicate his interest in money John 13, Additionally, Judas, like most people at the time, believed the messiah was going to overthrow Roman occupation and take a position of power ruling over the nation of Israel.
Judas may have followed Jesus hoping to benefit from association with him as the new reigning political power. No doubt he expected to be among the ruling elite after the revolution. So 3 Page Judas may have assumed just as the Pharisees did that since he would not overthrow the Romans, he must not be the messiah they were expecting.
There are a few Old Testament verses that point to the betrayal, some more specifically than others. We experience time in a linear way we see time as a straight line, and we pass from one point gradually to another, remembering the past we have already traveled through, but unable to see the future we are approaching.
It might help to think of time in relation to God as a circle with God being the center and therefore equally close to all points Albert Nicole. Rather, what Judas would choose eventually, God saw as if it was a present observation, and Jesus made it clear that Judas was responsible for his choice and would be held accountable for it. Satan, too, had a part in this, as we see in John 13, and he, too, will be held accountable for his deeds.
The base of this paper rested on the notion that it is unjust for a reader to limit their perceptions of Judas to the words and ideals of the Church Christianity.
Jesus-Judas relationship | Orphah Ruzvidzo - meer-bezoekers.info
I would subscribe to the work of Scorcese and Jewison for their works center around the one critical aspect of Judas' act which is overlooked by those who chose to rest all of the guilt upon his character. Judas is the one figure within the Christ narrative whose actions are necessary for the fulfillment of the messianic tradition. If Judas is the betrayer of Jesus, then he also acts as the accelerator of the messianic tradition.Why Did Judas Betray Jesus? - Hard Questions
As the rabbi in Nikos Kazantzakis novel states, "Do not be afraid; have faith! God's law is such that the knife must reach clear to the bone. Otherwise no miracle will take place! Judas betrayal of Jesus brings him to the abyss. There can be no messiah without a crucifixion. Judas act of bringing Jesus to his crucifixion is a noble one.
Scorcese's representation of Judas in his film exemplifies his understanding of this truism. Had Judas refused the will of God and not brought about Jesus' crucifixion, the messianic tradition is lost.
Without the existence of Jesus as the messiah, there is no Christianity. Scorcese and Jewison work from this viewpoint and I am convinced and left with the impression of a historically innocent figure of Judas. Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film: Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press,