Bahamas and united states relationship with israel

Bahamas - Fujitsu Caribbean

bahamas and united states relationship with israel

Permanent Observers · Civil Society · Institutional Relations · Trust for the Americas . OAS Inter-American Committee against Terrorism and The United States (U.S.) English, Vary per course, Onsite (Israel), Galilee International Management Institute, PAEC . Government of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas. PAEC. Related Links. U.S. Department of State Daily briefings, news and video; White House The White House News and photos of President Trump. [T]he Government of the Bahamas declared that it wishes to maintain the In the view of the Government of Israel, this Convention is not the proper place for making The Government of the United States of America states its objection to.

The provisions of these articles are inconsistent with the very nature of the Convention, which is universal in character and should be open for accession by all States. In accordance with the principle of equality, no State has the right to bar other States from accession to a convention of this kind. Objection United Kingdom, The Government of the United Kingdom do not regard the statement concerning paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Convention made by the Government of Bulgaria as modifying any rights and obligations under that paragraph.

Objection Germany, The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers as incompatible with the letter and spirit of the Convention the reservations made by the Government of Bulgaria concerning article 11, paragraph 1 of the Convention. Objection Greece, The Government of Greece cannot accept the reservation to paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Convention made by Bulgaria Objection France, The Government of the French Republic does not regard the statements concerning paragraph 1 of article 11 made by Objection Bahamas, The Government of the Bahamas do not regard the statement concerning paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Convention made by the Government of Bulgaria as modifying any rights and obligations under that paragraph.

Objection Canada, The Government of Canada does not regard the statement concerning paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Convention made by the Government of Objection Netherlands, the Kingdom of the, The Kingdom of the Netherlands does not accept the declarations by the People's Republic of Bulgaria Objection Thailand, The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand does not regard the statements concerning paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Convention made by the People's Republic of Bulgaria Now therefore [the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria declares] that the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria, having reviewed the said declaration, hereby withdraws the same.

Cambodia The diplomatic immunities and privileges provided for in article 37, paragraph 2, of the afore-mentioned Convention, recognized and admitted in customary law and in the practice of States in favour of heads of missions and members of diplomatic staff of the mission, cannot be granted by the Royal Government of Cambodia for the benefit of other categories of mission staff, including administrative and technical staff Objection Germany, The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers as incompatible with the letter and spirit of the Convention the reservations made by the Government of Cambodia concerning article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention.

bahamas and united states relationship with israel

Objection Australia, The Government of the Commonwealth of Australia declares that it does not recognize as valid the reservations to paragraph 2, Article 37, of the Convention made Objection Belgium, The Belgian Government Objection United Kingdom, The Government of the United Kingdom do not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations made by the Government of Cambodia.

Objection Denmark, Further, the Government of Denmark does not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of Article 37 made by This statement shall not be regarded as precluding the entry into force of the Convention between Denmark and the above-mentioned countries.

Objection Greece, The Government of Greece cannot accept Objection New Zealand, Objection France, The Government of the French Republic does not regard as valid the reservations to article 37, paragraph 2, made by the Government of Cambodia The Government of the United States, however, considers the Convention as continuing in force between it and the Objection Belgium, The Government of the Kingdom of Belgium objects to the reservations made Objection Bahamas, The Government of the Bahamas do not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations made by the Government of Cambodia.

It takes the view that these provisions remain in force in relations between it and Objection Thailand, The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand does not regard as valid the reservations and declarations with respect to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Convention made by Democratic Kampuchea The Permanent Mission of Canada notes the technical and administrative role of the Depositary, and that it is for States Parties to a treaty, not the Depositary, to make their own determination with respect to any legal issues raised by instruments circulated by a depositary.

In that context, the Permanent Mission of Canada notes that 'Palestine' does not meet the criteria of a state under international law and is not recognized by Canada as a state. Therefore, in order to avoid confusion, the Permanent Mission of Canada wishes to note its position that in the context of the purported Palestinian accession to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 'Palestine' is not able to accede to this convention, and that the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations does not enter into force, or have an effect on Canada's treaty relations, with respect to the 'State of Palestine'.

China The Government of the People's Republic of China holds reservations on the provisions about nuncios and the representative of the Holy See in articles 14 and Objection Ireland, The Government of Ireland object to the reservations made by the Government of the People's Republic of China concerning the provisions relating to Nuncios and the representative of the Holy See in articles 14 and 16 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

The Government of Ireland do not regard these reservations as modifying any rights or obligations under those articles. Cuba The Revolutionary Government of Cuba makes an explicit reservation in respect of the provisions of articles 48 and 50 of the Convention, because it considers that, in view of the nature of the contents of the Convention and the subject it concerns, all free and sovereign States have the right to participate in it: Objection Guatemala, The Government of Guatemala rejects formally the reservations to articles 48 and 50 of the Convention made by the Government of Cuba in its instrument of ratification.

Czech Republic In conformity with the valid principles of international law and to the extent defined by it, the Czech Republic, as a successor State to the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, considers itself bound, as of 1 Januaryi. Paragraph 2 of article 37 shall not apply. Objection Germany, The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers as incompatible with the letter and spirit of the Convention the reservations made by the United Arab Republic concerning article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention.

Objection Australia, The Government of the Commonwealth of Australia declares that it does not recognize as valid the reservations to paragraph 2, Article 37, of the Convention made by the United Arab Republic Objection Denmark, Further, the Government of Denmark does not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of Article 37 made by the United Arab Republic This statement shall not be regarded as precluding the entry into force of the Convention between Denmark and the above-mentioned countries Objection Greece, The Government of Greece cannot accept Objection France, The Government of the French Republic does not regard as valid the reservations to article 37, paragraph 2, made by Objection Tonga, In its notification of succession, the Government of Tonga has indicated that it adopts the objections made by the United Kingdom respecting the reservations and statements made by Egypt Objection Bahamas, The Government of the Bahamas do not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations made by the United Arab Republic.

Objection Thailand, The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand does not regard as valid the reservations and declarations with respect to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Convention made by France The Government of the French Republic considers that article 38, paragraph 1, is to be interpreted as granting to a diplomatic agent who is a national of or permanently resident in the receiving State only immunity from jurisdiction, and inviolability, both being confined to official acts performed by the said diplomatic agent in the exercise of his functions.

The Government of the French Republic declares that the provisions of the bilateral agreements in force between France and foreign States are not affected by the provisions of the Convention.

Hungary The Hungarian People's Republic considers it necessary to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of articles 48 and 50 of the Convention, under the terms of which a number of States were precluded from signing and are precluded from acceding to the Convention. The Convention deals with matters which affect the interests of all States and therefore, in accordance with the principle of sovereign equality of States, no State should be barred from participation in a Convention of this nature.

Objection Luxembourg, With reference to the statement made by the Government of Hungary upon ratification of the Convention, the Government of Luxembourg regrets that it cannot accept this declaration.

Iraq With reservation that paragraph 2 of article 37 shall be applied on the basis of reciprocity. Israel The Permanent Mission of Israel to the United Nations presents its compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in his capacity as depositary to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, and refers to the communication by the depositary, dated 9 Aprilregarding the Palestinian request to accede to this Convention Reference number C.

The Government of Israel does not recognize 'Palestine' as a State, and wishes to place on record, for the sake of clarity, its position that it does not consider 'Palestine' a party to the Convention and regards the Palestinian request for accession as being without legal validity and without effect upon Israel's treaty relations under the Convention. Japan Declaration with regard to article 34 a of the said Convention: It is understood that the taxes referred to in article 34 a include those collected by special collectors under the laws and regulations of Japan provided that they are normally incorporated in the price of goods or services.

For example, in the case of the travelling tax, railway, shipping and airline companies are made special collectors of the tax by the Travelling Tax Law. Passengers of railroad trains, vessels and airplanes who are legally liable to pay the tax for their travels within Japan are required to purchase travel tickets normally at a price incorporating the tax with out being specifically informed of its amount.

Accordingly, taxes collected by special collectors such as the travelling tax have to be considered as the indirect taxes normally incorporated in the price of goods or services referred to in article 34 a. Kuwait If the State of Kuwait has reason to believe that the diplomatic pouch contains something which may not be sent by pouch under paragraph 4 of article 27 of the Convention, it considers that it has the right to request that the pouch be opened in the presence of the representative of the diplomatic mission [concerned].

If this request is refused by the authorities of the sending State, the diplomatic pouch shall be returned to its place of origin. The Government of Kuwait declares that its accession to the Convention does not imply recognition of "Israel" or entering with it into relations governed by the Convention thereto acceded. Objection Israel, [The Government of Israel] has noted the political character of the declaration made by the Government of Kuwait on acceding to the above Convention.

In the view of the Govern- ment of Israel, this Convention is not the proper place for making such political pronouncements. The Government of Israel will, in so far as concerns the substance of the matter, adopt towards the Government of Kuwait an attitude of complete reciprocity.

Objection France, The Government of the French Republic does not regard as valid the reservation to article 27, paragraph 4, made by the State of Kuwait. Objection Canada, The Government of Canada also desires to place on record that it does not regard as valid the reservations to Libya 1 The accession of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya to said Convention cannot be interpreted as signifying in any form whatsoever any recognition of Israel nor does accession to said Convention imply the entertaining of any relations or obligations with Israel.

If such request is denied by the authorities of the sending state, the diplomatic pouch shall be returned to its place of origin. Objection Bulgaria, The Bulgarian Government does not consider itself to be bound by the reservation made by the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya concerning the application of article 27, paragraph 3, of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Objection Israel, The Government of Israel declared that it has noted the political character of the declaration made by the Government of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya on acceding to the above Convention.

The Government of Israel will, in so far as concerns the substance of the matter, adopt towards the Government of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya an attitude of complete reciprocity.

Foreign relations of the Bahamas

Objection Germany, The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers as incompatible with the letter and spirit of the Convention the reservations made by the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya concerning article 27 of the Convention.

The declaration is not to be interpreted as preventing the entry into force of the Convention as between the Federal Republic of Germany and the the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Objection Poland, The principles of inviolability of diplomatic pouch and freedom of communication are generally recognized in interna- tional law and cannot be changed by unilateral reservation.

This objection does not prevent entry into force of the Convention as between the Polish People's Republic and the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Malta The Government of Malta wishes to declare that paragraph 2 of article 37 shall be applied on the basis of reciprocity. Mongolia Referring to articles 48 and 50, the Government of the Mongolian People's Republic deems it necessary to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of articles 48 and 50 of the Vienna Convention and declares that, as the Convention deals with matters affecting the interests of all States, it should be open for accession by all States.

Morocco The Kingdom of Morocco accedes to the Convention subject to the reservation that paragraph 2 of article 37 is not applicable. Objection United Kingdom, The Government of the United Kingdom do not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations made by the Kingdom of Morocco. Objection Germany, The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers as incompatible with the letter and spirit of the Convention the reservations made by the Government of Morocco concerning article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention.

Objection Australia, The Government of the Commonwealth of Australia declares that it does not recognize as valid the reservations to article 37, paragraph 2, of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations made by Morocco Objection Bahamas, The Government of the Bahamas do not regard as valid the reservation to paragraph 2 of article 37 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations made by the Kingdom of Morocco.

meer-bezoekers.info | Treaty Database

Mozambique The People's Republic of Mozambique takes this opportunity to draw the attention to the discriminatory nature of the articles 48 and 50 of the present Convention which preclude a number of States from acceding to it.

In view of its broad scope which affects the interest of all States in the world the present Convention should therefore be open for participation of all States. The People's Republic of Mozambique considers that the joint participation of States in a convention does not represent their official recognition. Nepal Subject to the reservation with regard to article 8, paragraph 3, of the Convention, that the prior consent to His Majesty's Government of Nepal shall be required for the appointment to the diplomatic staff of any mission in Nepal of any national of a third State who is not also a national of the sending State.

Oman The accession of this Convention does not mean in any way recognition of Israel by the Government of the Sultanate of Oman. Furthermore, no treaty relations will arise between the Sultanate of Oman and Israel. Palestine The Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations presents his compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in his capacity as Depositary, and has the honor to refer to depositary notification C.

In this regard, Palestine is a State recognized by the United Nations General Assembly on behalf of the international community. As a State Party to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which entered into force on 2 Maythe State of Palestine will exercise its rights and honor its obligations with respect to all States Parties. The State of Palestine trusts that its rights and obligations will be equally respected by its fellow States Parties.

On article 27, para. The Government of the State of Qatar reserves its right to open a diplomatic bag in the following two situations: The abuse, observed in flagrante delicto, of the diplomatic bag for unlawful purposes incompatible with the aims of the relevant rule of immunity, by putting therein items other that the diplomatic documents and articles for official use mentioned in para.

Our Relationship | U.S. Embassy in The Bahamas

In such a case both the foreign Ministry and the Mission concerned will be notified. The bag will not be opened except with the approval by the Foreign Ministry.

bahamas and united states relationship with israel

The contraband articles will be seized in the presence of a representative of the Ministry and the Mission. The existence of strong indications or suspicions that the said violations have been perpetrated. In such a case the bag will not be opened except with the approval of the Foreign Ministry and in the presence of a member of the Mission concerned.

If permission to open the bag is denied it will be returned to its place of origin. On article 37, para. The State of Qatar shall not be bound by para. Accession to this Convention does not mean in any way recognition of Israel and does not entail entering with it into any transactions regulated by this Convention.

Objection Netherlands, the Kingdom of the, The Kingdom of the Netherlands does not accept both reservations made by the State of Qatar concerning article 27, paragraph 3, of the Convention. It takes the view that this provision remains in force in relations between it and the State of Qatar in accordance with international customary law.

If the authorities of the receiving State have serious grounds for believing that the diplomatic bag contains something which, pursuant to article 27, paragraph 4, of the Convention, may not be sent in the diplomatic bag, they may demand that the bag be opened in the presence of the representative of the diplomatic mission concerned. If the authorities of the sending State refuse to comply with such a demand, the diplomatic bag shall be sent back to the place of origin.

Furthermore, the Kingdom of the Netherlands does not accept the reservation made by the State of Qatar concerning article 37, paragraph 2, of the Convention. Objection Russian Federation, The Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics does not recognize as valid the reservations of the Government of Qatar with respect to article 27, paragraph 3 and article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

bahamas and united states relationship with israel

The Government of the USSR considers that the reservations in question are illegal, since they conflict with the purposes of the Convention. Objection Israel, The Government of Israel declared that it has noted the political character of the declaration made by the Government of Qatar. The Government of Israel will, in so far as concerns the substance of the matter, adopt towards the Government of Qatar an attitude of complete reciprocity.

Objection Belarus, The Government of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic does not recognize as valid the reservations of the Government of Qatar with respect to article 27, paragraph 3 and article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The Government of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that the reservations in question are illegal, since they conflict with the purposes of the Convention.

Objection Ukraine, The Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic does not recognize as valid the reservations of the Government of Qatar with respect to article 27, paragraph 3 and article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that the reservations in question are illegal, since they conflict with the purposes of the Convention.

Therefore the Government of Japan does not regard as valid the reservations concerning article 27 of the Convention made by Objection Australia, Australia does not regard as valid the reservations made by the State of Qatar Objection United Kingdom, The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland wish to place on record that they do not regard as valid the reservations to paragraph 3 of article 27, and to paragraph 2 of article 37, of the Vienna Convention on Diplo- matic Relations made by the Government of the State of Qatar.

Objection Germany, The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers as incompatible with the letter and spirit of the Convention the reservations made by the State of Qatar concerning article 27, paragraph 3 and article 37, paragraph 2 of the Convention. The declaration is not to be interpreted as preventing the entry into force of the Convention as between the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Qatar.

Therefore, the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic does not recognize these reservations as valid. The Government of the United States, however, considers the [Convention] as continuing in force between it and the Following a two-year long investigation, which had a couple of setbacks to be noted later, Saintil was lured to Washington, expecting a major pay-off for his illicit activities, only to find himself being arrested late last month. He is now in a federal jail. Separate indictments for Saintil, and for the other five, have been filed with the federal courts in the District of Columbia.

Observations The two cases, primarily the one against Saintil, show the strength of this particular investigation, the weakness of other parts of our immigration system, two unexpected complications in this specific case, and some interesting sidelights. Acting on a tip about a U. Embassy in Nassau, the feds enlisted the tipster, a citizen of Haiti and an American green card holder, as the first of three confidential human sources CHS-1 to work on the case.

Each was paid for lost time at their regular jobs, and reimbursed for travel and related costs.

bahamas and united states relationship with israel

CHS-3, a Haitian national, was tasked with trying to obtain a visitor's visa from the U. He is the one who is getting an S-5 visa; these are issued at the request of a law enforcement agency and can lead to a green card after three years. They are not to be confused with the much more common U visas, which are sought by alien crime victims.

With CHS-1 wearing a wire, he learned about Saintil's forging or buying employers' signatures, which along with bribes to Bahamian officials caused the issuance of Bahamian long-term work permits, which, in turn, are useful for third-country nationals seeking visitor visas from our embassy in Nassau.

Similarly, with the tape running, Saintil discussed using a small boat to smuggle aliens from Bimini the island closest to Florida and the prospects of finding an American citizen to marry CHS Saintil was paid by CHS-1 for some of his efforts with the local officials. All of these activities led to the creation of a highly detailed, page affidavit in support of a criminal complaint, which, after being approved by the judge in the case, led to Saintil's arrest at the end of September.

An interesting, if not terribly significant strength of the Saintil criminal complaint is that it was well written, provided background information often missing in these documents, and was the first indictment I have ever seen with footnotes, helpful ones. Meanwhile, and totally separately, a Haitian woman, Edna St Fleur, had fraudulently obtained a visitor's visa from the embassy, claiming to be an employee of the local branch of the Red Cross, doing, she said, good work in relation to HIV victims.

This was all fictional, and reviews of the Red Cross website in question, while naming staff members, never mentioned her. She managed to come to the United States once with this visa, and then returned to The Bahamas. Then she tried two other times to board planes to the United States, but was stopped each time by the pre-inspection process at the Nassau airport by officers of our Customs and Border Protection unit stationed there. They found her answers to questions to be of dubious honesty, and the second time around they seized her visa.